Harkin Joins Durbin, Cohen To Call For Congress To End Loophole that Encourages For-Profit Colleges to Target Veterans & Servicemembers
Wednesday, November 06, 2013
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA), Chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, and Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) introduced legislation in the Senate that would help put an end to the for-profit higher education industry's predatory marketing campaigns and aggressive recruiting of veterans, servicemembers, and their families. The Protecting Our Students and Taxpayers (POST) Act, which Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN) will introduce in the House of Representatives next week,would eliminate the loophole that allows these publicly-traded companies to receive more than 90 percent of their revenue from the federal government.
Harkin, as Chairman of the HELP Committee, released a report last year on the findings of a two-year investigation of the for-profit higher education industry, which highlighted widespread problems throughout the sector, including the predatory recruiting of veterans that this bill addresses.
“The Department of Defense’s Tuition Assistance program and the Post-9/11 GI Bill are intended to help servicemembers and veterans—who have sacrificed so much for our country—obtain a quality education. Instead, because of a loophole in the law, some for-profit colleges use predatory and deceptive tactics to target servicemembers and veterans for enrollment in order to tap into the benefits they and their families receive,” Harkin said. “Our servicemembers and veterans deserve better, and this common-sense bill will help protect taxpayer dollars and put the focus back on giving these men and women the degree and skills they need to build a brighter future.”
“In the United States, for-profit colleges account for a disproportionate share of the students who have trouble paying back their loans (a measure of value in education). They enroll only about 12% of all college students yet account for almost half of all student loan defaults,” said Durbin. “By law, for-profit college companies are allowed to receive no more than 90% of their revenue from federal financial aid programs. This high threshold allows far too much federal money to funnel to an industry that often provides a greater return on taxpayer investment to its administrators and investors than it does to its students. But there’s another catch. Money from the new Post 9/11 GI Bill and from Department of Defense tuition assistance programs isn’t counted which leaves hundreds of millions of taxpayers’ dollars virtually unregulated. Consequently, these schools aggressively target veterans and servicemembers who too often don’t receive the quality of education they deserve. We can’t let this continue.”
“For-profit colleges can receive overwhelming majorities of their revenue —up to 90%—from federal sources such as student loans,” said Congressman Cohen. “Too often, these schools fail in their duty to adequately prepare graduates for jobs that will allow them to repay those loans, leaving taxpayers to foot the bill. Even worse, current law allows unscrupulous colleges to receive even more federal funds by enrolling veterans and servicemembers. This loophole encourages bad behavior that weighs down our nation’s heroes with mountains of debt and few career prospects while lining the pockets of wealthy for-profit investors with taxpayer money. Simply put, this is unacceptable. We are entrusted with spending our monies efficiently and wisely, but too many for-profit colleges do not meet that test. I am glad to be working with Senators Durbin and Harkin to close this loophole, encourage for-profit colleges to provide better educations, and protect American taxpayers.”
Under the current federal 90/10 rule, for-profit colleges can only receive 90 percent of their revenue from the U.S. Department of Education’s federal student aid programs. The other 10 percent needs to come from sources other than the federal government. The purpose of this rule is to ensure that schools are not counting on taxpayer dollars to be their sole source of revenue. Because of the way the legislation was written, veterans’ and active duty servicemembers’ federal student aid – such as G.I. bill benefits and the Department of Defense’s tuition assistance funds – does not currently count toward the 90 percent. As a result, for-profit educational institutions have been aggressively recruiting and enrolling veterans, servicemembers and their families to their programs as a way to comply with the 90/10 rule.
The POST Act would reinstate the original ratio of 85/15—it was loosened to 90/10 in 1998—and change the definition of what counts as federal revenue so that it includes all federal funds. This new definition would eliminate the powerful incentive for for-profit schools to aggressively recruit servicemembers and veterans and ensure that all schools are complying with the law as it was intended.
Additionally, the POST Act would:
- Increase penalties for noncompliance with the new 85/15 rule– Under the legislation, for-profit colleges would lose eligibility to participate in federal student aid programs after one year of noncompliance with the new rule (currently, for-profit colleges must be noncompliant for two years before they lose eligibility).
- Eliminate accounting tricks that inflate non-federal funding sources–Currently, for-profit colleges that issue private loans directly to students are allowed to calculate a large portion as revenue for the purposes of 90/10 rule compliance before any of the loan is paid back. This accounting trick has led to for-profit colleges issuing private loans to students with little expectation of that loan being paid back. Today’s legislation would only allow actual payments that students make to be counted as revenue.
Chairman Harkin’s HELP Committee investigation found that in 2010, the for-profit education sector enrolled 10 percent of students, received 25 percent of the total taxpayer-funded student aid dollars, but accounted for almost 50 percent of the student loans in default. Additionally, the report found that many students left with debt, but no degree: more than half of students who enrolled in 2008-09 had withdrawn by mid-2010. For associate degree students, that number was even higher: 64 percent of 2-year students left with no degree.
Similarly, while for-profit schools are a minority of the institutions involved in the Tuition Assistance program, they take in a disproportionate share of Tuition Assistance funding. Chairman Harkin’s report found that 41 percent of Tuition Assistance in FY2011 went to just six for-profit colleges: American Public Education, Inc., which includes American Military University; Bridgepoint Education, Inc.; TUI Learning LLC; Apollo Group Inc.; Columbia Southern University; and Grantham University.
The Tuition Assistance program has been growing rapidly with more than 286,000 servicemembers enrolled in over 874,000 courses. In FY2012, the Defense Department spent $660 million on Tuition Assistance—half of which went to for-profit schools. More than 36,000 military spouses access courses through the MyCAA program and, in FY2012, the Defense Department spent $66 million on MyCAA—60 percent of which went to for-profit schools.
Organizations that have endorsed the POST Act include: The Education Trust, the National Association of College Admission Counseling, the Military Officers Association of America, and the Young Invincibles.
- Murray, Democrats Launch Effort Highlighting Benefits of Prevention and Public Health Fund for Families and Communities [Ranking Member]
- GAO Report Shows Drastic State Cuts to UI Benefits Harmed Job Seekers & Increased Costs for U.S. Taxpayers [Ranking Member]
- Alexander, Murray Announce Higher Education Act Reauthorization Working Groups [Ranking Member]
- Alexander, Murray Announce Higher Education Act Reauthorization Working Groups [Chairman]
- Murray: Accountability is Key for Protecting Taxpayer Dollars and Helping Students Succeed in Higher Ed [Ranking Member]
- Alexander: If Colleges Share in the Risk of Student Loan Defaults, They Can Help Reduce Overborrowing—and the Cost of College [Chairman]